![]() ![]() Industry-serving reason: Big cos can keep offering free shit for way longer than any new player can afford to. Self-serving reason: If the product is free, it's more likely to be killed if it doesn't get that much usage or gets a lot of usage and consumes resources but does not synergize with money-making parts of the company. This is not the usual "Google kills product", it's the type of thing that HN loves to say they would be happy to pay for ("Just give me something that does A B C and doesn't show me ads and I would be happy to pay for it!!!", well I guess until you are actually asked to pay for it).Īlso, as a general rule, people should welcome big cos moving away from the "free shit" product model for two reasons. Use duplicate detectors only to point out potential duplicates, but use your own judgement, which photos you want to keep and which are redundant.Surprised to see the level of anger here about this. Then we do not want to keep these recovered photos, but the versions we have been working with recently. Occasionally, there will be duplicates, that are scavenged photos found in the library during a library repair. We really have to be careful, when deleting duplicates. But I always compare the suggested duplicates myself, so I will be sure that I do not accidentally delete the version with the highest resolution or an edited version, that is a duplicate I added intentionally, to have the full sized version and a cropped version for example. Both can be configured to select the "keepers" based on rules, like "keep the one with the most metadata" or the largest version. Photo Sweeper does a very good job, also Power Photos. I never delete duplicates sight unseen en masse, that have been found a duplicate cleaner. It might be preferable, to keep the version you have added to an album and discard the duplicate you did not add to an album. ![]() But theinformation, that a photo is in an album is helpful, when you want to decide, which version of two identical photos to keep. You are only having duplicate copies of a photo, if you are seeing two identical instances of the same photo side-by-side in All Photos. Photos is not duplicating photos when adding them to an album. I thought that the whole point of the exercise was that the one in the album was not a duplicate, just the reference to the original photo. I have not tested Gemini, as I pointed out earlier. When it finds the duplicated party photos, it then asks whether you want to prefer keeping the version that is flagged to an Album (keeping the album intact) or deleting those and keeping some other version (ruining the Album). Now, you run a duplicate detector like Gemini 2. Later, some of those photos were duplicated (whether due to coding error, malfunction, or operator error). Imagine you went to a party and took a lot of pictures, then you created an Album of favorite photos from that party (which, as you know, does not create duplicates). It could have been trying to help you preserve the work you did putting photos into albums. (Actually, due to a recent bug, it can actually have a negative effect.)Įarlier, you said, "when presented with duplicate photos I was often given the option of one of them being in an album.". Deleting the Album itself without first deleting the photos will do nothing. When Gemini puts (not moves) photos into an Album, the intent is for you to open the Album, select the photos within it, and delete those photos from the library. have not checked), I see a couple of possible things that might help you: PhotoSweeper compares bitmaps and/or histograms so it can detect duplicate images even if they have different file sizes, file names, image sizes and capture dates.Īssuming for the moment that Gemini 2 has gotten better than it used to be (which. ![]() PhotoSweeper - $9.99 - Demo version available. Although more expensive I would recommend it as it has more capabilities than the others like the capability to merge Photos libraries or copy photos, both original and edited versions, along with their metadata between libraries. PowerPhotos is the iPhoto Library Manager version for Photos and is very powerful. I've run tests on the these two apps with the following results and found them to be safe to use: You don't want one that does the deletion itself for obvious reasons. You want an app that will identify the potential duplicates, put them in an album or mark them with a keyword for easy retrieval and deletion by you. If you need to remove duplicates in your library there are only two apps that I've been able to test and will recommend. Uninstall it according to the developer's instructions. It's not totally compatible with a Photos library. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |